The AI Chip Race Peaked in 2022. The Race That Replaced It Is About Packaging, Power, and Plumbing

The first land-grab of the AI hardware boom — the accelerator chip itself — peaked in 2022 and is receding in the patent record. What's rising instead is everything around the chip: the packaging that stitches dies together, the power electronics feeding the racks, and — fastest of all — the plumbing that keeps it from melting.

Ask the patent record where the generative-AI hardware race is happening and the answer has already changed once. The first land-grab — the neural accelerator chip itself — peaked in 2022 and is receding. What's rising instead is everything around the chip: the advanced packaging that stitches dies together, the memory that computes in place, and — fastest of all — the plumbing that keeps the whole thing from melting. Ten years of USPTO grant data trace a bottleneck moving down the stack, from silicon to package to radiator.

2022
the year AI-accelerator filings peaked
363 published applications, falling every year since
+33%
advanced-packaging grants, 2016 → 2025
2,602 → 3,448/yr — up in nine of ten years
4.8×
liquid- & immersion-cooling grants
47/yr (2016) → 224/yr (2025), still accelerating
0 → 341
quantum-computing grants (G06N10)
the CPC class didn't exist before 2019

The accelerator wave has already crested

Patents dedicated to neural-network hardware — the USPTO's classification for circuits purpose-built to run neural nets, the category NPUs and tensor cores land in — grew twentyfold from 2016 to a 2023 peak. But the forward- looking series, published applications, tells you what companies are filing right now: it peaked in 2022 at 363 and has fallen three years straight, to less than half that. Grants echo applications with a roughly two-year lag, and they turned down right on schedule in 2024.

01002003004002016201720182019202020212022202320242025GrantsApplications363 — apps peak (2022)323 — grants peak (2023)
ApplicationsGrants
Neural-network hardware (primary CPC G06N3/063x, /065x): published applications vs granted patents · hover for exact values · Source: 13.7M USPTO patent documents, analyzed by essentia.ai — Patent Analysis AI

That's not the AI hardware race ending — it's the easy architectural territory being claimed. The matrix-multiply engine at the heart of an AI accelerator is, by 2025, settled ground: Samsung, IBM, and Intel hold the biggest positions, and the marginal patent there protects less and less. The filings moved to where the constraint moved.

Where the constraint went: the package, the power, the plumbing

Three physical categories tell the story of AI's industrial phase. Advanced packaging — the H01L23/25 classifications that cover die stacking, interposers, and the CoWoS-style assembly every AI GPU depends on — is the steadiest riser in the entire hardware corpus: up in nine of the last ten years, +33% since 2016, and it never stopped growing through the downturns that dented every other semiconductor category. Power conversion patents tell a demand story: they slid for years to a 2021 trough, then turned around exactly as datacenter power became a boardroom topic. And rack-level cooling sat flat at ~500 grants a year for six years — then inflected in 2022 and hit 903 by 2025.

01k2k3k2016201720182019202020212022202320242025PackagingPower conversionRack cooling1,309 — power troughcooling inflects
PackagingPower conversionRack cooling
Granted US patents per year, physical-infrastructure categories · hover for exact values · Source: 13.7M USPTO patent documents, analyzed by essentia.ai — Patent Analysis AI

The steep small curves are the next decade

Below the big buckets, four young categories are compounding from a small base — and their slopes, not their absolute counts, are the signal. Liquid and immersion cooling grew 4.8× and is accelerating (47 → 224 grants/yr, with 2024–25 the two biggest jumps on record). Quantum computing went from a classification that didn't exist to 341 grants a year in seven years. In-memory compute — doing the math inside the memory array instead of shuttling data to a processor, the direct heir of the neuromorphic wave — is up from single digits to 90. And chiplet patents, near zero before 2021, are doubling roughly every two years as the industry decomposes big dies into linked tiles.

01002003002016201720182019202020212022202320242025QuantumLiquid coolingIn-memory computeChiplets
QuantumLiquid coolingIn-memory computeChiplets
Granted US patents per year, emerging categories · hover for exact values · Source: 13.7M USPTO patent documents, analyzed by essentia.ai — Patent Analysis AI

Each layer also has a different cast. The accelerator category belongs to Samsung, IBM, and Intel. In-memory compute is led by SK hynix — a memory maker betting the category is memory's future. Chiplets are Intel and AMD plus a wave of startups (d-Matrix, Eliyan, Kepler Computing). And the cooling leaderboard has no chip designers on it at all: Dell, Baidu, Cooler Master, Quanta — the people who build the boxes, not the silicon. The bottleneck's owners change as it moves.

The full scoreboard

Category (grants/yr)Trend’16→’25’16’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Advanced packaging (H01L23/25)+33%2,6022,7752,7672,9072,9732,8973,0983,2063,2543,448
Power conversion (H02M)-15%1,9412,1331,9751,9041,7011,3091,4421,4801,5201,659
Rack & equipment cooling (H05K7/20)+88%481515516634566520540607749903
Quantum computing (G06N10)new00045104106134222309341
Neural-network hardware (G06N3/063x)+1908%1223224694151236323255241
Liquid / immersion cooling (title)+377%474256879987112121176224
In-memory compute (title)+1700%51411173359728890
Chiplets (title)+2650%214521018313855

Read top to bottom, the table is a roadmap. The mature categories at the top move a few percent a year and belong to incumbents. The young ones at the bottom double and re-double, and their ownership is still up for grabs. If the pattern of the last decade holds — applications peak first, grants follow two years later, then the frontier moves down the stack again — the next categories to crest are packaging's successors: co-packaged optics and the thermal problem that never really gets solved, just relocated.

1 Granted patents are counted from the grant document itself (USPTO kind codes B1/B2) by grant year; published applications are pre-grant publications (kind A1) by publication year. Counts start at 2016 because CPC labeling only reaches ~100% coverage of grant records from 2019 onward (91% by 2016). Each patent is classified by its primary (first-listed) CPC label, so nothing is double-counted across categories.

2 CPC-based categories: neural-network hardware = G06N3/063x and /065x (dedicated physical implementations of neural nets); advanced packaging = H01L23 (semiconductor device details/housings) + H01L25 (multi-device assemblies); rack cooling = H05K7/20; power conversion = H02M; quantum = G06N10. "Liquid / immersion cooling", "in-memory compute", and "chiplets" are title-keyword categories (the concepts span many CPC codes), so they undercount somewhat — trend shapes, not absolute levels, are the point. Chip-level liquid cooling classified under H01L23/473 stays flat at ~50–80/yr throughout; the growth is all at rack and system level.

3 Post-2022 comparisons of semiconductor categories are affected by CPC's reclassification of parts of H01L into new H10* codes; the packaging codes used here (H01L23/25) were not part of that split.

4 Source: 13.7M USPTO patent documents, analyzed by essentia.ai — Patent Analysis AI; figures pulled August 2026.