While IBM's Patents Fell 76%, Its AI Patents Grew 57% — and Became Its #2 Category

IBM losing its 29-year run atop the US patent leaderboard in 2022 is old news by now. What hasn't been reported is what's underneath that number: broken down by technology area, the decline wasn't even close to uniform. Semiconductor patents fell 91%. AI and machine learning patents grew through the entire collapse, quietly becoming IBM's second-biggest granted-patent category.

IBM losing its 29-year run atop the US patent leaderboard in 2022 is already well covered — the company's own shift away from chasing patent volume, and the resulting drop from #1, has been widely reported. What's less discussed is what's underneath that topline number: broken down by technology area, IBM's granted-patent collapse wasn't uniform at all. Most categories fell by 80% or more. One — AI and machine learning — did the opposite, growing through the entire decline and quietly becoming IBM's second-largest granted-patent category by 2023. This post looks only at granted patents (not applications) and breaks the numbers down by CPC class to show exactly where that split happened.

+57%
AI / ML patents (G06N), against the tide
147/yr (2016) → 230/yr (2025)
#2
G06N's rank among IBM's granted-patent classes
by 2023 — passed H04L and H01L
−76%
IBM's overall granted-patent decline
9,209/yr peak (2019) → 2,191/yr (2025)
−91%
semiconductor patents (H01L), the steepest fall
1,298/yr peak (2019) → 113/yr (2025)

The one category that didn't follow the script

IBM's grant count moved in a tight band for six straight years — 8,021 in 2016 up to a 9,209 peak in 2019, still 8,673 in 2021 — before falling to 4,394 in 2022, then 3,653, then 2,449, then 2,191 by 2025: a 76% decline from the 2019 peak, tracking IBM's own 2020 statement that it would stop chasing raw patent volume in favor of higher-value filings (grant timelines run 2-3 years behind filing, so 2022 is exactly when that shift would start showing up in grants). Breaking that decline down by primary CPC class (each patent's first-listed, and therefore dominant, classification) shows it wasn't spread evenly — and one category ignored the trend entirely. Hover the chart for exact values per year.

01k2k3k4k2016201720182019202020212022202320242025G06F — computingH04L — digital comm.G06N — AI / machine learningH01L — semiconductorsG06Q — business methods
G06F — computingH04L — digital comm.H01L — semiconductorsG06Q — business methodsG06N — AI / machine learning
IBM annual granted US patents by top-5 primary CPC class · hover for exact values · Source: 13.7M USPTO patent documents, analyzed by essentia.ai — Patent Analysis AI
  • G06N (AI / machine learning) is the exception to everything else on this chart. It grew almost every year through 2023 (147 → 431, +193%) even as the topline total was cut in half, and while every other top category was falling. By 2023 it had overtaken both H04L and H01L to become IBM's second-largest granted-patent category — a title it still holds in 2025.
  • G06F (computing/software) is still IBM's largest category by a wide margin — but it's down 80%, from about 4,100/year through 2018 to 801 by 2025. It alone accounts for nearly half of IBM's decade total.
  • H01L (semiconductor devices) had the sharpest fall of any major category: −91%. IBM held 1,176-1,298 grants a year through 2016-2020, then semiconductor patenting fell off a cliff — 374 in 2022, 113 by 2025. This tracks IBM's well-publicized retreat from leading-edge chip manufacturing (the 2021 spin-off of its Microelectronics unit and shift toward chip research/licensing rather than fabrication).
  • H04L (digital communication) fell 82%, from a 1,275 peak in 2018 to 232 by 2025 — proportionally similar to the semiconductor decline, just starting from a smaller base.
  • G06Q (business methods) actually rose through 2021 (267 → 470) before falling back to 90 by 2025 — the only category with a genuine mid-decade peak rather than a straight decline.

The four biggest movers

G06N▲ +57%
AI/ML — the only top category that grew; overtook H04L and H01L by 2023 to become IBM's #2 granted-patent class
H01L▼ −91%
Semiconductors — 848/yr (2016) → 1,298 peak (2019) → 113/yr (2025); the sharpest collapse of any major class
H04L▼ −82%
Digital communication — 1,275/yr peak (2018) → 232/yr (2025), tracking the broader slide
G06F▼ −80%
Computing/software — still IBM's single biggest category by far, but down from ~4,100/yr to ~800/yr

Full annual breakdown, top 10 CPC classes

The bottom row is the true topline (all CPC classes, not just the top 10) — it's the 76% decline in one number. The rows above it show where that decline concentrated and where it didn't.

#Primary CPC classTrendTotal’16’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
1G06F — computing28,8054,1094,0904,0523,9973,6983,7591,8331,493973801
2H04L — digital comm.8,3991,0751,2681,2751,1901,1841,044469387275232
3H01L — semiconductors7,7538481,2381,2611,2981,176963374275207113
4G06Q — business methods2,74826727626837642747029116711690
5G06N — AI / machine learning2,49114713389206282355376431242230
6H04W — wireless comm.9901271891871471616733352420
7G06T — image/graphics processing9426510010214714114680623762
8G06K — data recognition86876120117112161160962033
9G11B — info storage (disks/tape)90115817416514912279331542
10G10L — speech processing57161716572797565382520
All IBM grants (any CPC)65,7018,0218,9619,0549,2099,0968,6734,3943,6532,4492,191

1 Counts start at 2016 because CPC labeling only reaches ~100% coverage of grant records from 2019 onward (91% by 2016); earlier years would understate activity. Each patent is classified by its primary (first-listed) CPC label, so nothing is double-counted across categories. Granted patents only (USPTO kind codes B1/B2 — the grant document itself), counted by grant year, not filing year; the earlier pre-grant publication of the same application is excluded so it isn't counted twice.

2 "IBM" combines every assignee-string variant of International Business Machines Corporation (including OCR/typo variants in the source XML); unrelated similarly-named entities (e.g. The Libman Company) are excluded. IBM subsidiaries filing under separate names are not included.

3 Source: 13.7M USPTO patent documents, analyzed by essentia.ai — Patent Analysis AI; figures pulled August 2026.